Muhammad: The prophet of pedophilia
A 1,400-year-old stain on humanity
The following essay contains factual information and discussion related to paedophilia, child sexual abuse and child rape. These topics may be distressing or triggering for some readers. Viewer discretion is strongly advised. If you feel uncomfortable with such material, please consider whether you wish to proceed.
Let’s cut the bullshit, the cultural relativism, and the cowardly academic tap-dancing. Muhammad, the self-proclaimed final messenger of God, was a pedophile.
Not by some fringe interpretation, not by “misunderstood” texts, but by the gold-standard records of his own followers that Muslims revere as divine truth. The evidence is not hidden in obscure scrolls; it is proudly displayed in the most authentic Islamic texts - Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim.
“The Prophet wrote the marriage contract with Aisha when she was six years old and consummated the marriage when she was nine.”
— Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 88
Read that again. A 53-year-old warlord took a six-year-old girl as his bride and raped her at nine. This is not allegory. This is not metaphor. This is not “spiritual marriage.” This is child rape, sanctified, celebrated, and emulated by millions for over a millennium.
When confronted with this grotesque reality, the defense squad rolls out their tired, intellectually dishonest script…
“It was normal back then!”
Yes, child marriage was common in 7th-century Arabia: just like slavery, tribal genocide, and stoning adulterers. So what?
Was female genital mutilation “normal” in Somalia? Doesn’t make it right.
Was cannibalism “normal” in Māori culture? Still barbaric.
Cultural norms do not override basic human decency. A nine-year-old cannot consent. Full stop.
“Aisha was actually 18–19!”
Yeah, nah. A desperate lie peddled by modern revisionists who cherry-pick weak hadiths and ignore the narrations Aisha herself reportedly gave.
Even if she were 18, Muhammad still betrothed a child and waited three years to consummate. That’s not romance. That’s whākn’ grooming.
“She loved him! She was happy!”
Tell that to every trafficking victim forced into “marriage” at gunpoint.
Aisha was an orphan under Muhammad’s protection. She had no power, no choice, no escape. Her “consent” was as real as a slave’s smile.
This isn’t ancient history: it’s active doctrine.
In Yemen, 8-year-old girls have died from internal injuries on their wedding nights: citing Muhammad as justification.
In Nigeria, Boko Haram kidnaps schoolgirls and “marries” them to fighters: quoting the same hadiths.
In Pakistan and Afghanistan, child brides are sold off with clerics chanting, “Sunnah of the Prophet.”
Every time a mullah defends child marriage, Muhammad’s ghost smiles. His example isn’t a relic, it’s a license to rape.
Imagine if a Christian leader said:
“Jesus married a 12-year-old: it was normal in Rome!”
The world would erupt. Cathedrals would be stormed.
When Muslims defend Muhammad’s pedophilia with “different times,” the West cowers behind “respect for religion.”Religion does not get a free pass on child rape.
If your faith requires you to defend a man who had sex with a nine-year-old, your faith is the problem.
Muhammad was no “product of his time.” He was a predator who weaponized divine authority to justify his lust. He did not elevate morality; he froze it in 7th-century sand. To every Muslim reading this - your silence is complicity. Stop defending the indefensible. Stop quoting hadiths that glorify child rape. Burn the page, not the child. The Prophet of Pedophilia deserves contempt, not reverence.
Facts.
Quick note: I’m never sure whether to use paedophile or pedophile, but for this article I’ve gone with pedophile. Not a word I use often, thank goodness.
The other issue for society is that Muslims will be killed, usually by a relative, if they denounce Islam. I think this would lead to any free thinking Muslim to stay in the faith.
How anybody can hold mohamed up as the saviour is beyond me.