Why is NZ’s mainstream media so quiet on the UK train stabbings?

In the UK, a horrific attack unfolded aboard a train travelling from Doncaster to London. The service made an emergency stop at Huntingdon station after a man went on a stabbing rampage that left eleven people injured, one of them fighting for their life. Police later confirmed the suspect was a 32-year-old Black British man and that the attack was not being treated as terrorism related.

While the incident has dominated headlines in Britain, coverage in New Zealand has been almost non-existent. The silence from our major media outlets raises uncomfortable questions. Why have New Zealand’s mainstream organisations barely touched this story? Is the answer as simple as the suspect’s identity not fitting the preferred narrative that many newsrooms seem to operate within?

In the UK, major publications such as The Guardian, BBC, Reuters and the Associated Press quickly published detailed reports, including eyewitness accounts and statements from police. Here in New Zealand, it has barely warranted a mention, not on front pages, nor in the top-read sections of our major news websites.

One explanation might be that editors simply see the story as distant and irrelevant to local readers. After all, international news coverage is often filtered through a local lens, with foreign events given less priority unless they involve New Zealanders. That reasoning only goes so far. In recent years, other overseas attacks, particularly those involving white male perpetrators, have received widespread coverage and editorial commentary in this country.

That discrepancy leads to an uncomfortable thought. Perhaps the muted reaction stems from the fact that the suspect is a Black man. Stories that challenge established narratives about race, violence and marginalisation often receive less attention. When the roles are reversed, when the offender is white and the victims are not, the coverage tends to be extensive, emotional and often political.

This is not to say New Zealand’s media deliberately withhold stories. However, there is an undeniable pattern of selective emphasis. Stories that reinforce the prevailing social script, that white men are inherently dangerous and that minority groups are perpetually victimised, are given prime space. When an event complicates that picture, it too often fades quietly into the background.

If you enjoyed this piece, consider supporting my work by becoming a paid subscriber or, if you’d rather keep it casual, shout me a beer. Every bit helps keep independent writing alive.

The problem with this approach is that it undermines public trust. If readers suspect that coverage is shaped more by ideology than by facts, confidence in journalism erodes. The public deserves consistent reporting, not selective storytelling that filters events through a political lens.

The Huntingdon train stabbings were an appalling act of violence. Whether the suspect is white, black, or any other background should make no difference to the level of coverage such a serious event receives. In New Zealand, the silence speaks volumes.

It may be convenient for editors to look away, but for readers who still believe in fair and balanced reporting. Is the media truly committed to telling the full story, or only the parts that fit the narrative?