Sean Plunket has just gone live on The Platform with what may be the most explosive broadcast of the year - delivering the full, uncensored story of Samuel Hudson. No spin. No filters. Just raw, confronting detail.
From bizarre incidents involving Big Macs and carrots to allegations of obscene and deeply disturbing public behavior, Plunket laid out everything that has been whispered behind closed doors - but never said out loud. Until now.
In a direct challenge to the media establishment, Plunket named names, calling out Andrea Vance and Charlie Mitchell of The Post for refusing to speak the full truth. He accused them of deliberate omission and cowardice in the face of a story the public deserves to hear.
But it didn’t stop there. In a serious escalation, Plunket revealed he is meeting with his legal team this afternoon regarding the article published by Vance and Mitchell, suggesting that legal action is now firmly on the table.
This broadcast is raw, unfiltered journalism. It’s the version of the story others are too afraid. or too compromised, to tell.
Listen now. Decide for yourself.
Who is Samuel Hudson?
Samuel Hudson is a largely unknown figure in New Zealand’s public landscape, though recent reports have drawn renewed attention to his activities. He is understood to have been a student at the University of Otago; however, details about his course of study or whether he completed a qualification remain unclear.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Hudson emerged as a vocal supporter of government vaccination efforts and was occasionally seen attending press stand-ups at Parliament. Despite this visible presence, he remained on the fringes of the media ecosystem.
Hudson founded ThisQuality, a self-styled independent media website. The platform promoted itself as an alternative source of news and commentary, but it struggled to attract an audience. It received little web traffic and is virtually unknown to the general public or media professionals in New Zealand.
His obscurity shifted to controversy following investigative reporting by Andrea Vance of The Post, who revealed that Hudson allegedly operated a pornographic channel featuring himself performing explicit sexual acts in public settings. One of the more widely referenced incidents on X involves a video of Hudson engaging in a sexual act with a Big Mac, which the writer of this publication has viewed. The content raises serious legal questions under New Zealand’s Summary Offences Act 1981, particularly Section 27 on indecent exposure:
27. Indecent exposure
(1) Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or a fine not exceeding $2,000 who, in or within view of any public place, intentionally and obscenely exposes any part of his or her genitals.
(2) It is a defence in a prosecution under this section if the defendant proves that he or she had reasonable grounds for believing that he or she would not be observed.
If confirmed, Hudson’s actions may fall within the scope of this offence, making the allegations potentially criminal in nature.
Socially, Hudson appears to operate within a small and tight-knit circle. He is known to associate primarily with far-left activists, including Joe Trinder and Matthew Tutaki, and is often seen engaging with them online and in activist environments.
While much about Hudson’s motivations and background remains murky, the public revelations surrounding his activities have raised serious questions about legality, anonymity, and accountability in the digital age. As scrutiny mounts, Hudson’s previously low profile may not remain in the shadows for long.
Multiple police complaints filed over public indecency videos allegedly posted by Samuel Hudson
Reports have surfaced that multiple users on the social media platform X have filed formal complaints with police concerning Samuel Hudson, a far-left affiliated online figure. Hudson is alleged to have uploaded explicit videos of himself engaging in public sexual acts, including acts of masturbation and other graphic behavior.
The footage, initially reported to have been hosted on the adult website Pornhub, has since been removed. However, several of the videos continue to circulate on lesser-known and alternative platforms. In some clips, nearby bystanders can reportedly be heard, adding to growing concern about the public setting in which these acts took place.
One individual who filed a complaint provided authorities with video evidence identifying Hudson as the person involved. The videos in question allegedly depict acts of public masturbation and anal penetration in open, publicly accessible areas — raising serious legal and ethical concerns.
Under New Zealand law, such behavior may constitute a criminal offense. According to Section 125 of the Crimes Act 1961,
“Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years who wilfully does any indecent act in any place to which the public have or are permitted to have access.”
At this time, police have not publicly confirmed whether an official investigation has commenced. Nonetheless, the shocking nature of the videos and their ongoing circulation have sparked widespread condemnation online and renewed calls for stronger content moderation across digital platforms.
As the story develops, legal experts and privacy advocates alike are urging authorities to take the matter seriously, citing the need to uphold community standards and protect public spaces from such conduct.
Share this post